![]() |
|
|
consulting services | company | clients | contact | home |
|
|
|
| Security Technology on Campus By Lowell Adkins, VP of Consulting This three-part series appeared in the April, May and June 2002 issues of the CR80 News publication Part
One:
Issuing the identification card This
is the first in a series of articles about access control and security on
campuses. These writings are
an outgrowth of a series of seminars I have done over the last several
years – and those seminars are the outgrowth of a lot of practical
experience I received developing a comprehensive access control system
working at Duke University. For
some of you this will seem like pretty basic stuff; for some it will be
new material. For all it will
hopefully be a chance to consider, or re-consider, the issues at stake in
this most important topic. At
the outset let me note that I understand that there is a difference
between the term “access control” and the term “security”.
Access control is generally the concept of who gets in where: when,
why, and how. Access control
is a subset of the larger concept of security – a system, program,
organization, or plan for the general protection of life and property,
usually in some defined area (e.g. a campus).
I will always attempt to use these terms properly. Let me warn the
purists now that I may stray occasionally. These
articles are going to focus on access control.
They are going to focus on systems that automate access control
primarily through the use of a card.
That is, the way an individual interfaces with the system is via a
card. I will attempt to be
generic enough that the thoughts presented here will apply to any type of
card: magnetic stripe, proximity, or chip – and any flavors of those.
Later, the discussion will include more thoughts about security. The
discussion will also later include thoughts about how access control
systems using cards relate to card systems for business and finance. For
the typical user, the most basic element of a card access control system
is the card itself. The
process by which the card is issued will often set the tone for how the
users relate to the system. It
also is the first big step in determining the integrity of the system. Make card issuance as
easy and convenient as possible – but issue with care – and inactivate
cards timely when necessary! 21st
century humans, especially it seems those that populate institutions of
higher education, expect the details of life to be as simple and
convenient as possible. Thus, the card issuance process needs to be as
easy and convenient as possible. For students, this process is likely
incorporated into the overall orientation procedure.
For faculty, staff, and everyone else, you must strive to make the
card issuance process straightforward:
Remember,
however, an easy and convenient process does not mean one without
structure. With the
heightened security status in the United States, card issuance procedures,
even on campuses, are more important now than they have ever been.
An institution can no longer assume that issuing a card is an
innocuous activity whose consequences will be felt only on its campus –
or perhaps at a few local merchants.
A campus issued card, particularly one with a photo and the
institution’s name/logo, may become a part of an identification
procedure in another setting that could eventually allow a person with a
questionable identity to obtain valuable identity documents. What
does all this mean? Balance
convenience with structure. Determine
what process, documents, and verifications you will require in order to
assure the identity of the person to whom you issue a card.
Take a renewed look at existing processes in light of recent
events. Then, publicize what your institution expects so that those
seeking a card from your institution can be prepared to come to the
issuance office with the documents your site requires. Once
a card has been issued several other situations come into play.
First, cards get lost or stolen.
One often hears the number 25% as the rate at which this happens
with students. Assuring that
an active lost/stolen card is quickly inactivated is just an important as
issuing the card in the first place. This task needs to fall to a device, or some staffed entity,
to provide this key service this 24 hours a day, seven days a week.
Simply permitting cardholders to call an answering device from
which messages are retrieved periodically throughout the day is not an
appropriate solution. Lost/stolen
cards must be replaced. If a
person has a reason to get a card in the first place, then he or she have
an equally important need to get a card back in their hands if it is
lost/stolen. So, again, this
is a task that needs to be accomplished 24/7 – and needs to be handled
with the same care as the original issuance process! Not
getting a replacement card back into the hands of the cardholder may
create security problems for that cardholder.
It may also encourage “work arounds” to the system that you
want to avoid. That is, if
getting a replacement card is a difficult process, then it may be easier
to borrow some else’s card And
maybe their PIN, too And
maybe their identity as well! Difficulty
getting a replacement may also be an incentive to prop open a door or
defeat an alarm. Cards
may need to be inactivated for reasons other than being lost/stolen.
The most obvious reason is that cardholders leave the institution.
This usually through some process, but not always; it usually
occurs voluntarily, but again not always.
All of these instances need to be addressed.
For those who leave through a process (e.g., withdrawal,
graduation, retirement) a standard notification procedure to the card
issuing office needs to be established.
And this procedure should be supplemented with a regular interface
between the student information system, the payroll system and the card
issuing system to match active students and active staff with active
cardholders. This enables any
individuals who were missed through the standard notification process to
be caught. As
with lost-stolen cards, cardholders whose departure is out of process need
to be deactivated through a 24/7 process.
These are often the individuals you most want to be assured are
quickly inactivated. |
|
|
|